
Biological control is the use of beneficial organisms to help control pest organisms. These beneficial organisms are often referred to as “biocontrol agents” or “natural enemies.” Weeds, pest insects, and plant diseases are some of the frequent targets of biological control in agriculture. Natural enemies can themselves be predatory/parasitic insects (targeting pest insects), herbivorous (plant-feeding) insects (targeting weeds), or diseases (“pathogens”) of pest insects, weeds, or even other harmful plant pathogens. Most of my comments below are directed at the use of predatory/parasitic insects to control pest insects.
A good overview of and background information about
biocontrol can be found at the following site, sponsored by
Links to other quality biocontrol pages can be found at: http://www.entomology.wisc.edu/mbcn/bcweb.html
And also at the following address.
This page contains several links to information pages about
biocontrol projects that currently underway around the country:
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/biocontrol/websites.html
A history of biological control as practiced in this
country, and some of the original “classic” success stories, can be found in
the document below, written by Mark Hoddle of the
We usually divide the practice of biological control into three categories: augmentation biocontrol, conservation biocontrol, and classical biocontrol.
1) Augmentation/innundative biocontrol [sometimes considered to be separate] is adding natural enemies, usually in large quantity, to a specific area where we are trying to manage pests, usually not with the goal of long-term establishment. This is the type of biocontrol with which the home gardener, for example, is most familiar. You often see ads in garden supply catalogs for natural enemies that you can order in quantity for local release. In the agricultural context, this is usually not a practical approach, given the physical scale of the areas needing pest management. The greenhouse industry can often use augmentation biocontrol to good effect, however, with their smaller, contained environments.
2) Conservation biocontrol is employing practices to help protect, conserve, or attract natural enemies that already occur in an area naturally, to help maximize their benefit.
3) Classical biocontrol is the introduction of natural enemies from abroad, with the goal of long-term establishment. Many of our insect pests are accidentally introduced from other places. One of the reasons they become pests is that they arrive without their own natural enemies that help control them in their native range. By introducing the natural enemies of a given pest here, we re-establish the predator-prey relationships.
The introduction of biocontrol agents into the
More about Classical biological control efforts in Soybean
The two most common types of insects used to control other insects are predators and parasitoids (a type of parasite). Predators (like ladybeetles) eat prey insects directly, and usually consume many prey in their lifetimes. Parasitoids (certain types of wasps and flies) often don’t prey on other insects as adults, but instead lay their eggs inside or on a host (prey) insect. The eggs hatch, and the immature form (larva, plural larvae) consumes the living host from within.
Generalizations can be dangerous because there are always exceptions to the rule. However, as a rule of thumb, predators tend to be “generalist” in their feeding habits, meaning that they attack a wide range of insect species. Parasitoids tend to be “specialists” and attack a very narrow range of insect hosts (often just one species, or a few closely related species). At the following link, click on the icons to learn more about these different types of natural enemies: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/biocontrol/index.html
There have been some tremendous and dramatic success stories from individual natural enemy introductions that have literally saved entire agricultural industries. But at a more rank-and-file level, it is often the combined effect of many different predators and parasitoids acting in concert on a given pest that can help keep it to acceptably low levels. However, biological control alone is often not enough to singlehandedly maintain these low levels pest levels in conventional agricultural systems.
Integrated pest management attempts to combine different strategies for managing pests and to find ways to make them work together. Biological control is often one component of an integrated pest management strategy. Insecticides are another important component. However, when certain insecticides are used to control pest insects, they also can kill the beneficial natural enemies that are in the fields. How can you use the two strategies together? These are the types of problems the IPM entomologists often work on. Some pesticides are narrow-spectrum, and only kill the target pest – not the natural enemies. So the use of narrow spectrum pesticides, when possible, is a good IPM strategy. Another strategy is the use of economic thresholds to determine when a pest insect really needs to be controlled. There are often certain low levels of pest insects that can exist in a crop without causing enough damage to warrant the cost of insecticide treatment. By using insecticide only when pest levels exceed this threshold, and not before, the cost of an unnecessary insecticide application is saved, and this also helps conserve the natural enemies in the field that are providing a certain level of background control for free. The economic injury level (EIL) is pest level that harms the crop plants enough to cause economic damage from yield loss equal to the cost of control. On the other hand, the economic threshold (ET) (also called the action threshold) is the pest level at which we recommend a producer treats the field to keep the pest population from reaching the level where it will cause economic damage that justifies the cost of the treatment. The ET is lower than the EIL -- not the point at which economic damage occurs, but the point to take action to prevent economic damage.
What About the
Asian Ladybeetle?
One of the greatest concerns when contemplating the
introduction of a foreign natural enemy is the impact that it will have on
non-target species, and the environment.
The standards for environmental assessment for predators and
parasitoids of insect pests have increased greatly in recent years.
An important component of whether an organism is suitable for
release/attempted establishment is how host-specific it is – how many prey
species it can and will use.
Generalists that attack a wide range of species are no longer considered
suitable for release. The more
species a predator attacks, the greater its ecological “footprint” is likely
to be – not just in terms of which non-target species may be affected, but
also in terms of the ripple effects that flow to associated species from
those species being affected.
The Asian ladybeetle, Harmonia
axyridis, now familiar to many homeowners and others in the
What About the Asian
Ladybeetle?
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/lbeetle/
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/mar95/001030.beetlemagstory.htm
What About
B. Communis?
Back to Binodoxys
communis, the parasitoid recently approved for release in the
The Environmental Assessment of B. communis prepared for the USDA is one of the most exhaustive evaluations of a proposed biocontrol agent ever. Based on this formal Assessment, which predicts a negligible impact of the parasitoid on non-target species and the environment, the USDA has granted the permit for domestic B. communis release, with hopeful establishment.
Given that already-existing natural enemies in this country provide a meaningful level of soybean aphid control already, why is an introduced biocontrol agent needed? Most of the natural enemies that currently attack soybean aphid are predators. The ecological niche for parasitoids remains relatively unfilled. Thus, a parasitoid would help fill out the complement of different natural enemy types acting against this pest species.
http://www.entomology.wisc.edu/sabc/